COVID-19 is not a plague but a state crime

Diesen Blog-Beitrag in deutscher Sprache lesen

Everything points to COVID-19 being a disinformation campaign, a state crime.

The overwhelming coverage on all channels, sweeping along like an avalanche, keeps meandering, branching and presenting ever new exciting twists.

It feels like breathtaking fiction:

Not even for sleep would we trade any detail of this engaging plot.

Any novel should accomplish masterfully its first sentence.

This story begins, at first sensibly, in a fish market in Wuhan, China.

Immediately, everyone wonders what bats that allegedly passed the virus to humans are doing in this market.

Later, it is ominously suggested that the virus may have escaped from a laboratory that develops warfare agents.

We always knew, didn't we, that the Chinese, as has been reported factually for decades, can't be trusted with anything.

Then microbiology heroes with storybook resumes appear, developing vaccines in record time that are understandably extremely challenging to store and transport.

Unfortunately, fatal complications may arise from vaccination with these delicate substances.

As the narrative progresses, the insidious virus mutates.

Overall, this story reads more like fiction than like reality.

Furthermore, the measures designed to combat the plague are less serious than witty.

There are actually people testing positive for this novel disease?

The results of these tests are likely determined at the time of manufacture.

This way, you control the incidence rate ad libitum:

Just a quick call to the best buddy from school days, now production manager, who has been put in charge of the factories that make the stuff.

In the Federal Republic of Germany, all legal and political coverage is based on an infection control law that is said to date from 2000.

For the new and utterly unexpected threat the responsible parliament passed quick changes and moderate extensions to this law.

As regrettable as well known, the parliament works much too slowly in serious matters, as it was intended exclusively for fun as theater or circus.

Insightful and ashamed, it consequently surrenders its powers to the more efficient executive.

The reckless lack of preparation must be excused:

Provably, no one had ever entertained the eschatological thought that a virus might wipe out as an apocalyptic horseman all of humankind.

Fighting a contagious disease used to be a matter of science - especially medical science.

Today, politicians like to sally into realms that have really nothing to do with politics.

Now we claim that this infection control law does not even exist and collapse the gigantic disinformation campaign in on itself:

Because in 2000, the parliament passed no Infektionsschutzgesetz (Infection Protection Act) at all, but on July 20, 2000, the Seuchenrechtneuordnungsgesetz (SeuchRNeuG) (Epidemic Law Reorganization Act), which we show here in the relevant Bundesgesetzblatt.

The text of this law is fake.

Because the first article of the SeuchRNeuG is supposed to be a law within a law:

Article 1:

Law on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in Humans (Infektionsschutzgesetz, IfSG) (Infection Protection Act).

The Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz, IfSG) amends for the last time (see Article 2 § 37) the previously applicable Bundes-Seuchengesetz (Federal Epidemic Act) in the version of the announcement of December 18, 1979 (BGBl. I p. 2262, 1980 I p. 151), in order to simultaneously repeal it (see Article 5).

We rub our eyes and ask in disbelieving amazement:

What sense is this supposed to make?

The - albeit very nicely written - Article 2 § 37 is utterly redundant.

Presumably it was overlooked in the forgery.

Part of the supposedly superseded Bundes-Seuchengesetzes (Federal Epidemic Act) was a health certificate for professionals working in particularly sensitive areas, such as in direct contact with food when preparing it for consumption by other people or with children in kindergartens and schools.

Now the health certificate, which required a medical examination by a public health officer, is said to have been replaced by a simple advisory:

However, you must not carry a contagious disease when exercising your profession in this sensitive environment!

Hopefully, contagious dangerous viruses, which are enjoying themselves in the bodies of the concerned professionals, will also feel addressed and will considerately extinguish themselves.

COVID-19 is consequently not a contagious disease but, in fact, a state crime whose intent the public should urgently clarify.

We can't wait!