A man in the middle

What I see on the internet is censored, i.e. manipulated, filtered or fake, courtesy my man-in-the-middle.

My internet provider should have been and possibly still should be KabelBW.

But I was first informed that KabelBW became Unitymedia.

Later they told me that Unitymedia doesn't exist anymore and is now Vodafone.

I feel obliged to apologize to my man-in-the-middle for all the hard work required of him on behalf of me.

The latest claim is certainly wrong:

At least the brand Unitymedia is still alive even though everybody tells me otherwise.

The man-in-the-middle gained access to my internet provider account and also canceled the SIM cards I had subscribed to.

He send me other SIM cards together with fake letters explaining the operation.

The new SIM cards are allegedly from PureMobile, whatever that is.

The letter above is fake:

Customers only get a customer number and not a current one (Aktuelle Kundennummer).

And on the bill below you see a different customer number.

Of course, there was no change:

I simply wasn't a customer at the time of the writing of the fake letter.

Probably they have full control over these SIM cards and can do many things like call diversion and call recording.

You are invited to manage your contract and see your bills related to PureMobile at selbstauskunft.vodafone.de which resolves to 65.9.108.24 on my computer.

Some links there - e.g. impressum - take you to www.vodafone.de which resolves to 139.7.147.41 on my computer.

www.vodafone.de doesn't refer to selbstauskunft.vodafone.de:

Vodafone wants nothing to do with the pitifully amateurish site selbstauskunft.vodafone.de boasting with Vodafone logos.

While www.vodafone.de is managed by Vodafone, selbstauskunft.vodafone.de is not.

I must also ask myself if the whole world has gone insane and if I am the last person endowed with reason on this planet.

Watch this video in German language, supposedly produced by Vodafone:

Good-looking, sympathetic people explain, accompanied by feel-good music, how to add former, that means legally defunct, Unitymedia contracts to the portal Mein Vodafone (My Vodafone), supposedly operated by Vodafone.

Of course, the whole portal Mein Vodafone is in itself laughable hogwash.

Please tell me, what person in their senses would add defunct contracts anywhere, except for nostalgic remembrance of past cherished life events?

This video is professionally produced - but man, are you serious?

Couldn't you think for a moment before producing this nonsense for what purposes whatsoever?

ING DiBa is asking me to agree to amended terms and conditions

Diesen Blog-Beitrag in deutscher Sprache lesen

ING DiBa is asking me more and more urgently to agree to amended terms and conditions.

When logging into their smartphone App Banking to Go, I have been asked for this consent for months.

I have always skipped this reminder.

Now I have received an additional email about this issue.

This message was sent from a computer with the IP address 5.9.36.106.

The machine with this IP address is poorly maintained, according to Shodan, which diagnosed known vulnerabilities.

In addition, the computer is not found in the domain it is supposed to belong to.

COVID-19 is not a plague but a state crime

Diesen Blog-Beitrag in deutscher Sprache lesen

Everything points to COVID-19 being a disinformation campaign, a state crime.

The overwhelming coverage on all channels, sweeping along like an avalanche, keeps meandering, branching and presenting ever new exciting twists.

It feels like breathtaking fiction:

Not even for sleep would we trade any detail of this engaging plot.

Any novel should accomplish masterfully its first sentence.

This story begins, at first sensibly, in a fish market in Wuhan, China.

Immediately, everyone wonders what bats that allegedly passed the virus to humans are doing in this market.

Later, it is ominously suggested that the virus may have escaped from a laboratory that develops warfare agents.

We always knew, didn't we, that the Chinese, as has been reported factually for decades, can't be trusted with anything.

Then microbiology heroes with storybook resumes appear, developing vaccines in record time that are understandably extremely challenging to store and transport.

Unfortunately, fatal complications may arise from vaccination with these delicate substances.

As the narrative progresses, the insidious virus mutates.

Overall, this story reads more like fiction than like reality.

Furthermore, the measures designed to combat the plague are less serious than witty.

There are actually people testing positive for this novel disease?

The results of these tests are likely determined at the time of manufacture.

This way, you control the incidence rate ad libitum:

Just a quick call to the best buddy from school days, now production manager, who has been put in charge of the factories that make the stuff.

In the Federal Republic of Germany, all legal and political coverage is based on an infection control law that is said to date from 2000.

For the new and utterly unexpected threat the responsible parliament passed quick changes and moderate extensions to this law.

As regrettable as well known, the parliament works much too slowly in serious matters, as it was intended exclusively for fun as theater or circus.

Insightful and ashamed, it consequently surrenders its powers to the more efficient executive.

The reckless lack of preparation must be excused:

Provably, no one had ever entertained the eschatological thought that a virus might wipe out as an apocalyptic horseman all of humankind.

Fighting a contagious disease used to be a matter of science - especially medical science.

Today, politicians like to sally into realms that have really nothing to do with politics.

Now we claim that this infection control law does not even exist and collapse the gigantic disinformation campaign in on itself:

Because in 2000, the parliament passed no Infektionsschutzgesetz (Infection Protection Act) at all, but on July 20, 2000, the Seuchenrechtneuordnungsgesetz (SeuchRNeuG) (Epidemic Law Reorganization Act), which we show here in the relevant Bundesgesetzblatt.

The text of this law is fake.

Because the first article of the SeuchRNeuG is supposed to be a law within a law:

Article 1:

Law on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in Humans (Infektionsschutzgesetz, IfSG) (Infection Protection Act).

The Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz, IfSG) amends for the last time (see Article 2 § 37) the previously applicable Bundes-Seuchengesetz (Federal Epidemic Act) in the version of the announcement of December 18, 1979 (BGBl. I p. 2262, 1980 I p. 151), in order to simultaneously repeal it (see Article 5).

We rub our eyes and ask in disbelieving amazement:

What sense is this supposed to make?

The - albeit very nicely written - Article 2 § 37 is utterly redundant.

Presumably it was overlooked in the forgery.

Part of the supposedly superseded Bundes-Seuchengesetzes (Federal Epidemic Act) was a health certificate for professionals working in particularly sensitive areas, such as in direct contact with food when preparing it for consumption by other people or with children in kindergartens and schools.

Now the health certificate, which required a medical examination by a public health officer, is said to have been replaced by a simple advisory:

However, you must not carry a contagious disease when exercising your profession in this sensitive environment!

Hopefully, contagious dangerous viruses, which are enjoying themselves in the bodies of the concerned professionals, will also feel addressed and will considerately extinguish themselves.

COVID-19 is consequently not a contagious disease but, in fact, a state crime whose intent the public should urgently clarify.

We can't wait!

Criminal complaint against unknown persons and the operators of the De-Mail system

Criminal complaint against unknown persons and the operators of the De-Mail system, initially at 1&1 De-Mail GmbH, Mentana-Claimsoft GmbH and procilon IT-Solutions GmbH, according to §§ 268, 269, 270 StGB and all other relevant criminal offenses

For months, even years, I have been trying to report crimes committed against me to the state investigation authorities: By email, by post as a standard letter, by registered letter with advice of receipt, by fax, by lawyers: In vain, as you can read above in the cover letter and the other attached criminal complaints.

Finally, I wanted to try De-Mail:

https://www.bsi.bund.de/DE/Themen/DigitaleGesellschaft/EGovernment/DeMail/DeMail.html

Now I am a customer of 1&1 De-Mail GmbH with a P.O. Box andreas.pfefferle@amp-e.de-mail.de.

After the Attorney General at the Federal Court of Justice, whom I had written to by De-Mail registered letter, declared himself to be not competent, I turned to the Karlsruhe Public Prosecutor's Office on 05/25/2020, again by De-Mail registered letter, under the address sta- karlsruhe@egvp.de - mail.de.

To my De-Mail registered letter, I immediately received a dispatch confirmation from the De-Mail system via versandbestaetigung@sec.de-mail.de:

This confirms that the message was sent to the recipient with the following information.

The confirmation was sent by sec, http://www.sec.de-mail.de.

(By the way, the URL http://www.sec.de-mail.de leads into digital nirvana.)

However, I have not received an acknowledgment of receipt for my De-Mail registered letter until today.

Therefore, I contacted the customer service of my De-Mail provider, 1&1 De-Mail GmbH, first by phone and then by email.

At first, I received an utterly pointless answer: You only receive confirmations of receipt if you select the option “registered mail“, which I had done and paid for.

After I had complained to the 1&1 customer service about this nonsense, I received a new explanation:

You only receive a confirmation of receipt if you choose the option “Personal and confidential“ – I have no idea what is technically behind this option and what the 0.24 € per message are supposed to buy me – and thus, if you succeed to comply with all legal formalities. The courts have a traffic light system that only permits the admission of De-Mail messages that have been confirmed by the sender – that is, sent with the option “Personal and confidential“.

In contradiction to this, however, I received a standard post office letter, allegedly from the Public Prosecutor's Office in Karlsruhe, dated 06/02/2020, which refers to my De-Mail registered letter and does not mention any legal formal error on my part.

Because of these discrepancies, I suspect that the De-Mail system operators are cheating me and that my messages never reach their destination.

Therefore, I sent my message again to the Public Prosecutor's Office in Karlsruhe on 06/19/2020 at 08:24 pm, as a registered letter and this time with the option “Personal and confidential“ mentioned by the customer service, taking one hundred and three other public prosecutor's offices of the Federal Republic of Germany on Cc.

I immediately received a dispatch confirmation from sec, http://www.sec.de-mail.de, and/or versandbestaetigung@sec.de-mail.de, and also in the period of approximately three minutes, between 08:26 pm and 08:29 pm, about twenty confirmations of receipt from fp-demail.de, http://www.fp-demail.de, and/or eingangsbestaetigung@fp-demail.de.

Further confirmations of receipt from fp-demail.de, http://www.fp-demail.de, and/or eingangsbestaetigung@fp-demail.de, were received between 08:47 pm and 21:46 pm.

According to my current technical understanding, the company procilon IT-Solutions GmbH maintains a De-Mail mailbox at Mentana-Claimsoft GmbH, a subsidiary of Francotyp-Postalia, to which all De-Mail messages are sent that are indirectly addressed via the De-Mail address to electronic court and administration mailboxes (EGVP).

The company procilon IT-Solutions GmbH then distributes the messages, which have ended up in the collective account at Mentana-Claimsoft GmbH, to the EGVP participants.

Presumably, Mentana-Claimsoft GmbH generates confirmations of receipt immediately when the message is deposited in the De-Mail collective mailbox of procilon IT-Solutions GmbH, although the message has not yet reached the actual EGVP recipient.

Obviously, in this system, the sender can never know whether his message has actually been delivered to the addressed EGVP participant.

Maybe my current technical understanding is wrong.

Irrespective of this, it is extremely worrying that for some registered De-Mail messages acknowledgments of receipt were generated several times and with different time stamps.

For example, I have received four confirmations of receipt from the Augsburg Public Prosecutor's Office through fp-demail.de, http://www.fp-demail.de, or eingangsbestaetigung@fp-demail.de:

Hereby it is confirmed that the message with the metadata listed below was received on 06/19/2020 at 08:57:12 pm in the mailbox of the recipient 'sta-augsburg@egvp.de-mail.de'. The message was deposited in the collective mailbox of the recipient procilon IT-Solutions GmbH.

Hereby it is confirmed that the message with the metadata listed below was received on 06/19/2020 at 08:59:00 pm in the mailbox of the recipient 'sta-augsburg@egvp.de-mail.de'. The message was deposited in the collective mailbox of the recipient procilon IT-Solutions GmbH.

Hereby it is confirmed that the message with the metadata listed below was received on 06/19/2020 at 09:12:05 pm in the mailbox of the recipient 'sta-augsburg@egvp.de-mail.de'. The message was deposited in the collective mailbox of the recipient procilon IT-Solutions GmbH.

Hereby it is confirmed that the message with the metadata listed below was received on 06/19/2020 at 09:39:04 pm in the mailbox of the recipient 'sta-augsburg@egvp.de-mail.de'. The message was deposited in the collective mailbox of the recipient procilon IT-Solutions GmbH.

And from the Karlsruhe Public Prosecutor's Office I have received three confirmations of receipt through fp-demail.de, http://www.fp-demail.de, and eingangsbestaetigung@fp-demail.de:

Hereby it is confirmed that the message with the metadata listed below was received on 06/19/2020 at 08:57:02 pm in the mailbox of the recipient 'sta - karlsruhe@egvp.de-mail.de '. The message was deposited in the collective mailbox of the recipient procilon IT-Solutions GmbH.

Hereby it is confirmed that the message with the metadata listed below was received on 06/19/2020 at 08:58:50 pm in the mailbox of the recipient 'sta - karlsruhe@egvp.de-mail.de '. The message was deposited in the collective mailbox of the recipient procilon IT-Solutions GmbH.

Hereby it is confirmed that the message with the metadata listed below was received on 06/19/2020 at 09:11:54 pm in the mailbox of the recipient 'sta - karlsruhe@egvp.de-mail.de '. The message was deposited in the collective mailbox of the recipient procilon IT-Solutions GmbH.

In total I have received one hundred and fifteen confirmations of receipt for the one hundred and four De- Mail registered messages sent: From some public prosecutor's offices none at all, from some, one, two, three, or four.

Obviously, the De-Mail system is not working correctly: I claim that this computer system has been tampered with.

When I call up the URL https://de-mail.1und1.de, I am redirected to a login page. In the source code of that page I found this tag:

<script type="text/javascript" src="_files/demail-providers.js"></script>

The file _files/demail-providers.js had the following content on 06/24/2020 at 02:22 am:

var deMailProviders = ["web.de-mail.de", "gmx.de-mail.de", "drv-bund.de-mail.de", "polizei-herford-nrw.de-mail.de"];

About forty minutes later, at 03:03 am on June 24, 2020, the contents of the file _files/demail-providers.js had changed as follows:

var deMailProviders = [];

Consequently, someone must have changed the contents of this file between 02:22 am and 03:03 am on June 24, 2020.

The content of the variable deMailProviders is used in the source code of the application to determine valid De-Mail addresses. The source code checks if this variable is defined and changes its behavior accordingly.

The obviously optional presence of the file _files/demail-providers.js, which can be used to influence the behavior of the 1&1 De-Mail web application, corroborates my suspicion that the system has been manipulated.

This suspicion is further confirmed by the initially completely pointless mentioning of the Herford Police in the source code of the 1&1 De-Mail web application and the modification of the file _files/demail- providers.js file at nighttime.

The case Maddie McCann is a fabrication

Now I realize that they might have told the horrified public that I am involved in or responsible for a crime that disappointingly did never take place.

In the Internet Archive you can find the source code for the web site they desperately set up in search for publicity to save the child.

The first submission to the Internet Archive occurred some four days after the crime was supposedly perpetrated.

They submitted utterly unready, incomplete stuff with no trace about the author or copyrights.

No programmer in this world without criminal intentions would do this.

And then we hear them seriously asking for helpful information about a car that doesn't exist in our valley of tears.

But those magicians know about its whereabouts.

This is how the Bundeskriminalamt (Federal Criminal Police Agency) describes people they ask for helpful infomation about: We tell you that he is a man, we tell you that he is German and we tell you his age. The rest - how tall he is, his hair color, his eye color and so on ... - we won't tell you, just for fun.

They only must show pictures of a different car in the name of higher interests: Such as killing an entire completely innocent family as a little favor asked by someone with contacts to people with values, power and money.

"Where have you seen this Jaguar XJR6, first registered in 1993, used by the pedophile pervert created by our sick and stupid police psychologist imagination?"

The car used by the fictitious pervert is equally fictitious because it was not even in production in the year 1993.

The pictures of the girl are photo-shopped and the McCanns who appear tearfully on television programs are actors.

This picture, supposedly taken by my surveillance camera on 07/27/2021, is either fake as photo-shopped or lying as staged

Preamble to this post

I have tried to post this in various places:

The criminals who insisted on removing my post are less than a piece of shit.

They are committing a crime against humanity and are proud of it.

One can respect some criminals for their intelligence or courage.

What they are doing does not merit the name crime:

Cabrera Infante, Crimen, ¡cuántas libertades se cometen en tu nombre!

If I survive this I will prosecute all the guys who criminally removed my post: They will go to jail.

They have the power to remove my post but are afraid of confronting me in a conversation.

As always:

The powerful are corrupted by their power until their brains are nothing but sponges.

Can't you see why I am deliberately sharing my own private information.

This explanation for taking down my post exposes the criminality at work:

Rule Violation: Warning for Sharing Personal or Private Information

We’ve been alerted that you’ve violated Reddit’s rule against sharing personal or private information in the following content.

Link to reported content

Reddit is a pseudonymous community, and revealing or threatening to reveal someone’s personal, private, or confidential information is not allowed. This includes sharing links to someone’s public Facebook page or LinkedIn account, or sharing screenshots where the person’s name or personal information is viewable. We also don’t tolerate posts or communities that coordinate, encourage, or participate in investigations aimed at finding and revealing private, personal, or confidential information about others.

Before participating in Reddit further, make sure you read and understand Reddit’s Content Policy, including what’s considered sharing personal or private information.

If you’re reported for any further violations of Reddit’s Content Policy, additional actions including banning may be taken against your account(s).

This is an automated message; responses will not be received by Reddit admins.

I re-post my stuff which was removed for no sane reason whatsoever.

Sorry, my native language is German. Please excuse mistakes in my use of English.

Legally I am being accused of nothing. This is completely criminal. They don't want to take this to court.

First they wanted to kill me by suicide or take care of me in an institution depriving me of all my rights:

No longer being able to speak in court they would have ruined my family driving them to suicide.

I didn't do them the favor.

So they are looking for other means and they will find them.

What can you do if a state or some other criminal agent with vast resources wants to kill you?

I openly admit that I have troubles.

I call it a nervous disorder. But I am neither schizophrenic nor paranoid.

My name and address:

Andreas Pfefferle

Im Eichbäumle 18

76139 Karlsruhe

Germany

I am married and I have an eighteen year old son. My parents live next door.

None of them can or want to help me in this matter.

They wanted to commit the perfect crime exterminating my whole family but I spoiled the party.

This is the end game.

Now they will certainly kill me if this doesn't go viral.

If I were simply delusional, paranoid or schizophrenic they would put me in an institution by court order.

But they can't because I have documents and hardware to prove that I am right.

It is possible that I am a public person locally or globally without knowing:

My family's access to news is filtered and manipulated:

For this purpose they even installed additional dedicated telephone and TV lines.

Believe it or not they print a customized newspaper for us and criminal contact persons we thought were our friends so they can speak with us.

They claim or are going to claim that I am a perverse pedophile.

Probably I have also raped dozens of women.

All this is complete nonsense:

I have never committed a crime in my life according to the German Penal Code.

Now the post:

Picture fake or staged: They wanted to kill me making it appear a suicide and then frame me thereby exterminating my whole family by suicide

This picture, supposedly taken by my surveillance camera on 07/27/2021, is either fake as photo-shopped or lying as staged.

The guys in police uniform, probably real police officers, are criminals who either were never at my home or never with me at my home. In the second case, the person, supposedly me, sandwiched between the uniformed rascals, is in fact not me but somebody else impersonating me.

Because of an incident on 07/27/2021 involving four uniformed morons, three men, and one woman, who the surveillance camera should have captured, I wanted to check the camera around 01:00 am on 07/28/2021: It was gone. I entered and searched my house with suspicions, noting a missing cell phone. Alarmed, I decided to spend the night at my parent's. Around 06:00 am on 07/28/2021 the surveillance camera was back. A check revealed the replacement of the flash disk by another one, where I found the above-mentioned fake or lying photo. Later I discovered the missing cell phone in my house in the living room under an armchair.

My only explanation for all of this is, that somebody had illegally taken the cell phone from my house and the surveillance camera from my garden to criminally manipulate them quickly before bringing them back, a plain falsification of evidence.

Unfortunately, I thwarted their hopes of nobody noticing.

The police or some other criminal agent with vast resources wanted to frame me after killing me that day/night making it appear like a suicide thereby exterminating my whole family by suicide with false allegations about me.

The Art of Being Insane Madness and Civilization Business Site

Criminal complaints at the Attorney General at the Federal Court of Justice

Diesen Blog-Beitrag in deutscher Sprache lesen

On 05/13/2020 I filed criminal charges with a letter to the Attorney General of the Federal Court of Justice in order to initiate the legal evaluation of my decades of persecution on fascist motives.

On 05/19/2020 I found the following letter in my mailbox:

The the Attorney General of the Federal Court of Justice declares itself to have no jurisdiction.

On 07/02/2020 and on 07/24/2020 I sent an extended version of my letters with criminal complaints, which I had filed with public prosecutors, to police authorities of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Criminal complaint for fraud against the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah

Diesen Blog-Beitrag in deutscher Sprache lesen

Criminal complaint for fraud (§ 263 StGB) and all other relevant criminal offenses against the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah

Dear Sirs,

with this letter, I, Andreas Pfefferle, born on 10/23/231965 in Karlsruhe, residing at Im Eichbäumle 18, 76139 Karlsruhe, identity card number L8RYVHWVG, file a criminal complaint against the

• lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah, Kantstraße 4, 76137 Karlsruhe and unknown persons

for fraud (§ 263 StGB) and all other relevant criminal offenses.

Please confirm receipt and provide me with the relevant file number.

Justification:

The PDF documents mentioned below can be found at:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GVWqzWbb8vdV-H-xn1vThDBqRs1TkAmn?usp=sharing

On the night of 08/26/2016, I was, against my will, taken by the police with 0.3 ‰ blood alcohol concentration into a drunk tank and then from there, again against my will, taken by the police to a psychiatric hospital, where I was placed in a closed ward against my will, and according to the patient file (Patientenakte.pdf, page 29), which was perhaps partly falsified, without a treatment contract.

On December 29, 2016, an unauthenticated copy of a decision of the District Court of Karlsruhe, dated August 26, 2016, with the reference number 710 XIV 777/16 L - obviously a violation of the file regulations, as there is no department 710 at the District Court of Karlsruhe - by the judge Wermann (AG-Beschluss-26-08-2016.pdf) was allegedly officially delivered to me.

I asked the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah to appeal against this (AG-Beschwerde-Dr-Schneider-Addae-Mensah-29-01-2017.pdf).

Later, I received an undated copy of a decision by the District Court of Karlsruhe on this complaint, dated 01/30/2017, from the judge Dr. Schwirblat (AG-Beschluss-30-01-2017.pdf).

This letter, which was not signed by the judge Dr. Schwirblat, should have

1. been delivered formally
2. been delivered to my attorney, Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah, instead of me
3. been in certified copy instead of drawn up

Since the decision of the District Court of Karlsruhe from 01/30/2017 did not remedy my complaint, the matter allegedly went to the Regional Court of Karlsruhe.

From my lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah I later received a decision of the Regional Court of Karlsruhe in uncertified copy and without signatures of the judges, which rejects my complaint in an unappealable decision (LG-Beschluss-03-07-2017.pdf).

I then instructed my lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah to lodge a constitutional appeal against this decision of the Regional Court (BVG-VB-Dr-Schneider-Addae-Mensah-10-08-2017.pdf).

In 2018, attorney Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah sent me a copy of a decision of the Federal Constitutional Court, not certified and not signed by a judge, in which my complaint is not accepted for decision (BVG-Beschluss-05-10-2018.pdf).

Thereupon I arranged for the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah to submit my complaint to the European Court of Human Rights (EGMR-Dr-Schneider-Addae-Mensah-18-01-19.pdf: Attorney Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah states 12/18/2019 as the date of his signature, although the complaint was allegedly filed on 01/18/2019).

In 2019, I received from the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah a decision of the ECHR in English in uncertified copy, which cannot be found anywhere in the publicly accessible databases of the ECHR (EGMR-Beschluss-14-03-2019.pdf).

It follows that the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah never filed an appeal against the decision of the District Court of Karlsruhe (AG-Beschluss-26-08-2016.pdf), dated 08/26/2016, reference number 710 XIV 777/16 L, and that the matter could therefore not be referred to the Regional Court of Karlsruhe, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and the European Court of Human Rights.

However, I paid for the services of the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah: The invoices are available as evidence:

The human rights lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah probably cheated me. My attempt to litigate was apparently thwarted by the lawyer I had hired.

At the request of the lawyer Andreas Thomalla, Apothekergässchen 4, 86150 Augsburg, I was granted access to the files for reference number 710 XIV 777/16 L at the District Court of Karlsruhe - see document Akte.pdf.

This document is obviously forged in whole or in part because it contains unsigned and uncertified judicial decisions. However, the falsified file contains allegedly received pleadings from the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah.

In December 2018, I received an allegedly certified but unsigned letter from the District Court of Karlsruhe (care matters) - see AG-BG-07-12-2018.pdf. I asked Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah to prevent the appointment of a supervisor for me.

The entire correspondence - AG-BG-Dr-Schneider-Addae-Mensah-16-01-2019.pdf, AG-BG-Beschluss-19-02.2019.pdf - is obviously forged, since the decision of the district court is presented drawn up instead of in certified copy.

In the matter of a parcel sent to me, allegedly from Amazon, which seems suspicious to me, I had initially contacted the police by email seeking help. Only today, I know that my Internet traffic is manipulated and that my criminal charges may never have reached their destination. By request of Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah, I wanted to obtain access to the file. The file (Akte-Amazon.pdf), which Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah later presented to me, is probably a forgery.

I would therefore ask you to initiate an investigation and inform me of the result.

Yours sincerely,

Andreas Pfefferle

Criminal complaint for deprivation of liberty and insurance fraud

Diesen Blog-Beitrag in deutscher Sprache lesen

On November 29, 2019, I filed criminal charges according to § 239 StGB (deprivation of liberty) and § 263 StGB (fraud, insurance fraud) against all persons responsibly involved in my custody on August 26, 2016, with subsequent involuntary stay from August 26, 2016, until August 31, 2016, in the clinic for psychiatry and psychotherapeutic medicine of the Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe.

The public prosecutor's office in Kalrsruhe replied in a grotesque letter dated December 5, 2019.

The treatment contract submitted by the complainant (document 23) refers to optional services that are not covered by statutory health insurance companies. However, such were, according to the argument of the complainant, not charged. The obligation to reimburse the expenses of the treating party by statutory health insurance results from public law, irrespective of the conclusion of a contract for optional services.

For these reasons, there was no investigation procedure to be initiated.

A brazen lie!

Translation:

You are the victim of state crime and should seek asylum in a state which honors the rule of law!

By letter dated December 20, 2019, I lodged a complaint.