Criminal complaint for deprivation of liberty

Diesen Blog-Beitrag in deutscher Sprache lesen

On 08/11/2019 I wrote by email to the following email addresses

• KARLSRUHE-WALDSTADT.PREV@polizei.bwl.de (Police station Karlsruhe Waldstadt)
• KARLSRUHE.KD.FUEGR@polizei.bwl.de (Police headquarters Karlsruhe)
• stuttgart.lka@polizei.bwl.de (State Criminal Police Office of Baden-Württemberg)

under the subject: Criminal complaint for deprivation of liberty:

Ladies and Gentlemen,

with this email message I am filing a criminal complaint for deprivation of liberty according to § 239 German Penal Code against the person mentioned in the order of 07/03/2017 of the Regional Court of Karlsruhe, file number 11 T 52/17

• Dr. Geßler, police doctor on contract.

For the reasons I refer to my blog post under the link:

A Season in Hell

There you will find the complete context to the order of 07/03/2017 of the Regional Court of Karlsruhe, file number 11 T 52/17, the order itself, as well as the letters of the lawyer who represented me in this case.

To sum up, I mention here:

The Regional Court of Karlsruhe writes in its order of 07/03/2017, file number 11 T 52/17:

The father of the 51-year-old affected person contacted the police station Karlsruhe - Waldstadt on 08/26/2016 at 4.40 a.m. and asked the police officers for help because his son was mentally ill and had thoughts of suicide running around the house screaming that he would kill himself.

The police officers who appeared on the scene were able to determine that the affected person had cuts on his wrists which apparently did not bleed. The affected person informed the police that he was terminally ill and could not be cured. He was also mentally ill and took antidepressants. In the course of making contact, a mixed consumption turned out to have taken place. An ENVI TEC alcohol test carried out at 04.48 a.m. showed a breath alcohol content of 0.35 permille.

After consultation with the police contract doctor Dr. Geßler, it was decided that the person concerned was currently not fit to be admitted to a psychiatric institution according to PsychKHG but should first sober up. The affected person was taken into police custody and taken to a sobering cell.

Around 6:30 a.m., the on-call judge in charge heard the affected person by telephone. He informed the judge that he had the right to take his own life and that he was taking medication. However, he did not want to specify it.

Around 10:00 a.m. the person concerned was again brought before the police contract doctor Dr. Geßler. The doctor decided that person concerned should be admitted to a psychiatric institution according to the PsychKHG. However, he asked that the person concerned be kept in custody until 12:00 noon, since the admission could only take place after the mixed consumption had sobered up and a further attempt to take his own life was to be prevented until then.

The affected person was then transferred to the Municipal Hospital, where he remained voluntarily until his discharge on 08/30/2016.

(The subordinate clause

where he remained voluntarily until his discharge on 08/30/2016

is part of a botched cover-up attempt.)

Accordingly, the police contract doctor Dr. Geßler decided on 08/26/2016 to arrest me in a psychiatric institution in accordance with PsychKHG, after he had me imprisoned for about eight hours in a sobering cell to "sober up" 0.35 permille.

Both the imprisonment in a sobering cell and the admission according to PsychKHG lack any legal basis.

This results already from the fact that the admission according to PsychKHG was to be hushed up, after I had put in a protest over a lawyer against the imprisonment in the psychiatric facility:

Suddenly it was said that I was voluntarily on a closed ward, and in the order of the District Court of Karlsruhe on the incidents of 26.08.2016, business number 710 XIV 777/16 L, which was sent to me on 12/29/2016, the admission according to PsychKHG is not mentioned at all.

I would therefore ask you to open an investigation and to inform me of the outcome of the investigation.

Yours sincerely,

Andreas Pfefferle